Pakistan Β· Product

A SaaS development company in Pakistan for founders, not projects.

Multi-tenant products with accounts, roles, subscriptions and an admin you can actually run the business from. Built so your own engineers can take it over β€” which is the point, and the part most agencies quietly make hard.

1st
Of its kind in Pakistan β€” Traveloup
4.9β˜…
Highest-rated product we shipped
110+
Projects delivered
15+
Repeat clients

Why founder builds fail here

The demo works. The business underneath it was never built.

Agency-built products fail in a recognisable way, and never at the part the founder was worried about. It is almost never the feature list.

Single-tenant, sold as multi-tenant

The fastest way to demo a product is to build it for one customer and add the second one later. Later turns out to mean a rewrite of the data model, because tenancy is not a feature you bolt on β€” it is an assumption in every query, every upload path and every background job. Ask any prospective firm to explain how tenant isolation works in the schema before you sign.

Billing treated as a screen

Subscriptions are not a payment form. They are proration, failed cards, dunning, upgrades mid-cycle, refunds and a tax position, and every one of those is a support ticket you will be answering personally at 11pm if it was skipped. Local card processing adds its own failure modes on top.

A codebase nobody can hire against

Founders raise a round, hire two engineers, and discover the product is written in a way that only its authors can extend. Conventional structure and readable code are worth more to you than clever code, because your exit from us is the thing that determines your leverage over us.

Building a product from Pakistan, sold anywhere

How it runs

Smallest testable thing first.

01

Product call

Who pays, what for, and what has to be true for them to pay again. Free, and it sometimes ends with us telling you not to build yet.

02

Scope the first release

One flow, done properly, with tenancy and billing decided even if only one plan ships. Fixed price, written down, inside 48 hours.

03

Build against real users

Staging from week one, and your first customers in it before launch rather than after. Instrumentation goes in with the features.

04

Launch, then hand the keys over

Your repository, your infrastructure, your Stripe or PayFast account. Continuing with us is a choice you re-make monthly.

Money

Priced per release, not per year.

Product shaping

Two sessions and a written first-release scope: the flow, the data model, the tenancy decision and the billing model. Yours to keep, including if you build it elsewhere.

  • βœ“Schema and tenancy decided
  • βœ“Written scope you own
  • βœ“Fixed, quoted up front

First release

The smallest version real customers can pay for, built properly underneath. Fixed price, fixed scope, and deliberately smaller than what you came in wanting.

  • βœ“Multi-tenant from day one
  • βœ“Billing that handles failure
  • βœ“Repository in your name

Ongoing product work

A monthly team after launch, for the roadmap that only exists once users arrive. Cancellable, and designed to be replaced by your own hires.

  • βœ“Month to month
  • βœ“Handover brief included
  • βœ“We help you interview

No figures on this page or anywhere else on the site. Product scope varies more than any other category we work in β€” the same feature list costs very differently depending on the tenancy and billing model underneath it β€” so the number follows the shaping sessions rather than an estimate made before them.

FAQ

Founder questions.

Is this different from hiring a web app development company in Pakistan for a project?
Materially, yes. A project has an end date and a client who owns the requirements. A product has users who do not, a roadmap that changes after launch, and a business model that has to survive contact with churn. The engineering overlaps; the scoping, the instrumentation and the handover do not, and it is the reason this page exists separately from the rest of the cluster. If what you need is genuinely a one-off internal build, the custom software page is the more honest fit and it is priced differently.
Do you take equity instead of fees?
No. It sounds founder-friendly and it goes wrong in both directions β€” an agency with a small stake is not incentivised like a co-founder, and a founder who gave away equity for a build usually regrets the price they set on it later. Fixed price, phased so you can stop, is the cleaner arrangement for both sides.
Who owns the intellectual property?
You do, entirely, from the first commit rather than at final payment. The repository is created inside your organisation, not ours. Any third-party libraries used are permissively licensed and listed in the handover document, so a future acquirer's technical due diligence does not turn up a surprise.
Can you build on top of what we already have?
Often, and it is usually cheaper than a rewrite even when the existing code is poor. The teardown reads what is there and gives you a straight continue-or-restart answer with the reasoning. Rewrites are the more profitable recommendation for us, which is exactly why the assessment is written down rather than delivered as an opinion on a call.
How do you handle payments for a product selling internationally?
Stripe where your entity allows it, a local gateway where it does not, and the architecture kept behind an interface so the two are swappable. This is worth deciding before the build rather than during it, because the entity question β€” where the company is registered and where the money lands β€” constrains the options more than the code does.
What if we raise and want to hire in-house?
That is the planned ending, not a failure. Conventional stack, documented decisions, and we will brief and help interview your first engineers at no charge. The transition works best over about a month of overlap rather than a handover call, and we would rather schedule that than have it happen abruptly.
How long until we have something customers can use?
For a genuinely narrow first release, six to ten weeks is realistic; the platforms above ran longer because they shipped more than a first release. The variable is not engineering speed, it is how quickly the scope stops moving β€” which is why the shaping sessions exist and why they are the part we insist on.

Tell us who pays, and what for.

A free product call and a written read of the first release inside 48 hours. It quite often ends with a smaller build than you arrived asking for.