United Kingdom · Products

A SaaS development company UK founders can leave.

Multi-tenant products with roles, permissions and an admin side that someone other than you can operate. Built on conventional foundations so your own engineers can take the codebase over the week you hire them.

5 mo
Largest platform build
2
Sides + admin, Just Book
10,000+
Services listed
100%
Code handed over

Read this before you commission

The first version should be embarrassing, and it should exist.

Most failed products here did not fail at the engineering. They failed because eleven months of building happened before anybody outside the founding team used the thing.

The scope that grows while you build

The single most common pattern: a product specified at forty screens, launched at ninety, eighteen months late, and the forty would have answered the question. Every feature added before the first real user is a bet placed with no information. We will push back on scope — sometimes hard — and the push-back is the service. An MVP development company UK founders should hire is one that argues you out of features, not one that quotes them cheerfully.

The demo that cannot become the product

The opposite failure, and it costs more. Something is assembled quickly to show investors, it works, and then it turns out there is no tenancy model, no permission system and no way to have two customers without them seeing each other's data. Retrofitting that is close to a rewrite. There is a middle path — conventional architecture, tenancy in from day one, features ruthlessly cut — and it is the one worth paying for.

Nobody scoped the boring half

A product is not the feature you pitched. It is that feature plus sign-up, password reset, roles, invitations, an admin view for your support person, an audit trail for when a customer disputes something, and a billing integration that handles a failed card. That list is most of the work, it is the same list for nearly every product, and a quote that does not mention it is a quote for the demo.

What we have shipped, and what we have not

How it runs

Smallest useful thing first.

01

Teardown

Free, written, inside 48 hours — including which features we think you should cut from version one, and why.

02

Scope and fixed price

The cut-down version, priced. Every screen, the boring half included, and what is explicitly deferred.

03

Build in the open

A staging URL from week one that you and a handful of real users can log into long before launch.

04

Launch and hand over

Repository, hosting, every account in your name — and documentation aimed at the engineer you have not hired yet.

Money

How we quote a product.

Version one, fixed scope

The deliberately small first release. One written scope, one price in pounds, and a list of what we have argued out of it and why.

  • Tenancy and roles from day one
  • The boring half included
  • Deferred list written down

Build then iterate

Version one fixed-scope, then a monthly arrangement once real users are in it and you are deciding from evidence rather than guesses.

  • Monthly, cancellable
  • Reprioritised from usage
  • Stop whenever you like

Rescue a stalled product

A build that has run long, a demo that cannot scale, or a codebase whose author has gone. Quoted after we read it.

  • Written assessment first
  • Continue-or-rebuild answer
  • Full credential handover

No figures appear on this site in any currency. Product quotes vary more than any other category on it, because the difference between forty screens and ninety is the whole price. The teardown is free and gives you a real number for the version we think you should build.

FAQ

Straight answers.

Are you a web app development company UK startups can use before they have raised?
Often, and it is usually the better moment to talk. Pre-raise the pressure to over-build is lower and the useful question — what is the smallest thing that proves people want this — is easier to answer honestly. What we will not do is take a project we think is too large for the money available; a half-built product is worse than none, and we would rather scope you something smaller that ships.
Should we go with a SaaS development company London founders have used, given they are down the road?
If proximity genuinely matters to how you work, yes — and for a first-time founder who wants to sit beside the team, that is a legitimate reason worth the difference. Where we win is on scope for the budget and on the fact that we will argue with you about features. Ask both of us what we would cut from version one. The answer tells you more than the price does.
Can we take the codebase in-house later?
That is the design goal. Conventional framework, standard structure, no in-house abstractions invented to be clever, and documentation written for the engineer you have not hired yet. At handover you get the repository, hosting, every third-party account and a walkthrough. A product you cannot staff is a product you do not really own.
How do you handle billing and subscriptions?
Through an established payment provider rather than anything homegrown — recurring billing looks simple and is not, once you meet failed cards, proration, refunds, VAT treatment across borders and a customer disputing a charge from four months ago. The integration work is straightforward; the design decisions around it are where the time goes, and they belong in scoping rather than in week nine.
What is the smallest sensible first version?
One user type, one workflow, done properly, with tenancy and roles underneath it even though you only have one customer. That last part is the bit people cut and the bit that is expensive to add later. Everything else — the second user type, the reporting, the integrations, the mobile app — waits until someone who is not you has used version one.
Do you take equity instead of fees?
No. It sounds founder-friendly and it misaligns everything: a studio with equity has a reason to keep building rather than to finish, and you end up with a shareholder who is also your supplier. Fixed scope, fixed price, and you keep your company.

Find out what to cut.

A free written teardown inside 48 hours: what version one should contain, what should wait, and what it takes to build the smaller thing.