Islamabad · Working with UK and US teams

Hire dedicated developers who stay on the project.

Named engineers from our Islamabad office, working in your repository on your board, for as long as you need them. No rotating bench, no account manager between you and the people writing the code.

60+
Clients served
110+
Projects delivered
15+
Repeat clients
5 hrs
Daily overlap with London

Why remote engagements fail

It is rarely the distance.

We have inherited enough abandoned offshore projects to see the same three failures over and over, and none of them is really about geography.

The person you interviewed is not the person you get

A staffing agency puts its strongest engineer in the sales call and assigns whoever is free on Monday. You find out in week three, when the questions being asked in standup are ones you already answered. Ask for the names, the CVs and a call with each person before you sign anything — and treat a refusal as the answer.

Nobody owns whether it works

Bill by the hour and every incentive points at more hours. The engineer builds what the ticket said, the ticket was wrong, and the rework is billable too. Somebody has to be accountable for the outcome rather than the timesheet, and it should be written down which side that is.

The handover that never comes

Code sitting in an agency repository, deploys only one person can run, a domain registered to somebody else's email. It is not usually malice — it is drift — but the effect is the same the day you want to leave. Everything should be in your accounts from the first commit, not migrated at the end as a favour.

How an engagement starts

You meet the people before you commit.

01

One scoping call

What you are building, what your stack is, and how many people it genuinely needs. If the honest answer is fewer than you asked for, that is the answer you get.

02

Names and CVs

We propose specific engineers, you interview them yourself, and you can decline any of them. The person you meet is the person who joins.

03

A paid trial period

Two weeks of real work on your board before anyone signs a longer commitment. It is easier to judge a developer by a pull request than by a call.

04

Weekly, in your repository

Your GitHub, your project board, your staging environment. A demo every week, and direct access to the engineers rather than a summary of what they said.

The two questions everybody actually asks

Shapes of engagement

Three ways this normally runs.

One engineer

A single developer on your team full time, in your standups and your repository. The usual start, and the easiest to judge quickly.

  • You interview them first
  • Two-week paid trial
  • Monthly, with notice

A small team

Two to five engineers with a lead who runs the day to day, for a product that needs building rather than maintaining. You still direct what gets built.

  • Named people, not a headcount
  • One lead accountable to you
  • Weekly demo in your repo

Fixed-scope build

You want a defined thing delivered, not a team to manage. Written scope, one quote, and we carry the delivery risk instead of you.

  • Everything listed before we start
  • Out-of-scope stated explicitly
  • Full handover at the end

No figures on any of these on purpose. What is fixed is the process — one scoping call, a written quote inside 48 hours, named engineers you interview, and a trial period before any longer commitment.

FAQ

The awkward questions first.

How much does it cost to hire a software developer through you?
We do not publish rates, here or anywhere on this site, because a single figure would be misleading for almost everyone reading it. What decides the number is seniority, the stack, how long the engagement runs, and whether you are directing the work or we are accountable for delivering an outcome. One call and you get a written quote within 48 hours covering all four — which is a more useful document than a rate card, because it is about your project rather than an average of everyone's.
Who exactly will be working on my product?
People we name before you commit. You get CVs, you interview each engineer yourself, and you can turn any of them down. When you hire dedicated developers from us the person in the interview is the person on your standup, and if that ever has to change we tell you before it happens rather than after you notice.
Are you an offshore software development company or a staffing agency?
Closer to the former, and the distinction matters. A staffing agency's product is a filled seat, so it is finished once someone is placed. We are a build shop that also embeds engineers, which means the people we send you spend the rest of their careers here being judged on whether things shipped. That is the incentive you actually want on the other side of the table.
How is this different from hiring a custom software development company for a fixed-scope build?
Chiefly in who carries the risk and who does the thinking. A fixed-scope engagement is right when you know precisely what you want and want it delivered for an agreed price — we take the delivery risk and you take less day-to-day involvement. An embedded team is right when the specification is going to change weekly, which is the normal condition of a product that is still finding its shape. We do both, and the scoping call will tell you which one your project actually is, including when the answer is the cheaper one.
Who owns the code and the intellectual property?
You do, from the first commit rather than at the end. Work goes into your repository, deploys run on your infrastructure, and the contract assigns intellectual property to you outright. If an engagement ends you keep everything without asking, because there is nothing of yours sitting in our accounts to hand back.
What if someone is not working out?
Tell us in the first two weeks and the trial simply ends — that is what the trial is for and there is no argument about it. Later than that, we replace the person and absorb the handover time rather than billing you for a second engineer to learn what the first one already knew. It happens; pretending otherwise would just make it more expensive when it does.
Can you work in our hours?
Partly, and it is worth being precise. Our day is nine to six Pakistan Standard Time, which overlaps a London working day by five hours with nobody changing anything. New York shares almost none of it, so for US accounts we agree a shifted schedule in the scoping call and write the specific hours into the contract. What we will not do is claim standing coverage of American business hours, because sustaining that would mean either a night shift you are not paying for or a promise that quietly stops being kept in month three.

Start with the scoping call.

Tell us what you are building and what your stack looks like. You get an honest view of how many people it needs, CVs for the ones we would put on it, and a written quote inside 48 hours. If the answer is that you do not need a team yet, that is what we will say.